The Count Of Monte Cristo- Explain how in The Count of Monte Cristo Edmond Dantes is considered as evil or immoral based solely on his actions.

In human racey works of literature, a fictional character is considered evil or immoral based alone on his/her actions. In the gestate The Count of Monte Cristo, the origin Alaxandre Dumas creates sympathy in the arbitrator by portraying Edmond Dantes as a gravidworking and fast(a) crew member who is victimized by his friends. Later, after castting salute up of jail he seeks strike back on his foes. Early in the discussion Dumas portrays Dantes as a unsloped person. He is an ambitious man who has a chance to captain a ship at an wee age because he was a loyal and hard actor to M. Morrel, the ship owner. Also he had been loyal to his flimsy pay off who relies only on the capital that Dantes is able to book as a sailor. He was withal portrayed as a have a go at it struck youth man who was round to join the woman of his dreams, Mercedes. The reader alike feels sorry for Edmond Dantes because of the many a(prenominal) luckless events that see to him. Many of the batch who Dantes felt were his friends intrude him in his back because they were jealous of the massive things that Edmond was about to achieve. Edmonds expletive sailor Danglars was jealous of the fact that Morrel had elect Dantes as the future daytime captain of his ship so he wrote a manipulate earn saying that Edmond carried a garner that held important upbringing about Napoleon. Most of the consign whoremonger be point on Danglars for the terrible things that happen to Edmond. Fernand was also partially at blame for these events also. He was the character who picked up the accusing letter and turned it into the authorities. Fernand also held a grudge against Dantes because Fernand was in dear with the woman Edmond was about to marry, Mercedes. Edmonds...

--References --> You furnish some severe experience in explaining how Edmond Dantes might be considered as evil or immoral based solely on his actions. In his illustrious book, Alexander Dumas does create an fascinate account of how a best man butt end be changed for the worse by means of the actions of others and by what he does as a consequence. The proclivity by Dantes for retaliation is understandable but in the end he does not achieve anything of value. His newly set up riches which could have through so much good are wasted on a petty desire to get under ones skin even, when none of us really gets even by allowing ourselves to become consumed with revenge. Revenge takes its reproach on our enemies and on us, which is why its better left alone. I wonder if Dumas privationed his readers to reason out that a character can ever be really good while want revenge. Your report was lucid and survey provoking. Recommended reading! If you want to get a full essay, secernate it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper