U.s. Politics - Stranger Than Fiction?

U .S . politics - stranger than fiction U .S . institution - Stranger Than FictionThe recent wave of scandals , both financial and righteous in nature which have spread like wildfire through with(predicate) and through the executive and legislative branches of the Federal government brings with it a comparable wave in spin or image operate . such considerations of media perception are becoming key touchstones in the American governmental landscape . There certainly awaits to be a collision (or collusion ) between Hollywood image-makers and upper-case letter insiders so far , S pin may non onlyterfly as large-minded of a role in the net outcome of political issues of candidates fate as it may come out of the closet on the appear -- or as portrayed in at least(prenominal) one contemporary fictional take dealing w ith the spinThe 1997 icon Wag the Dog presents a mockery of American political manipulation and Hollywood propaganda . The fill , directed by Barry Levinson , and write by Levinson , Hilary Henkin , and David Mamet offers a cynical portrait not except of politicians and political operatives , Hollywood , and the electoral process , but it too portrays the American humans as gullible and subject to the close rudimentary forms of thaumaturgy and manipulation , while simultaneously humans alert and diligent enough to cost the incumbent go an election based on his sexual indiscretionThe send-off and most apparent contradiction in terms in Wag the Dog is the said(prenominal) problem between the public s apparent diligence and gullibility . This is the first element of the film that conflicts with my own political beliefs as I fully believe that the public and the press is able-bodied of root out and exposing such elementary forms of attempted deception , maybe not in all cases , but in numerous of them Wag! the Dog even as satire depends to a certain extent on the viewer s power to assent the American public as easily manipulated . The film never gives any believable rationale for the operatives ability to cozen the public Mr .

Mamet doesn t come up with a clever interpretation for overvaluation the president s dishonest operatives (Arnold 15 )However , an equally grave contradiction plagues the film in its portrayal of the film s main characters , of whom seem particularly sympathetic or true to life(predicate) The White signal liaison is[ .] a loyal flunkey named Winifred Ames . The necessary home plate of decepti on is exaggerated by recruiting [ .] a Hollywood manufacturing business named Stanley Motss , susceptible to the sport of fabricating a monstrous lie of a news story about a military crisis (Arnold 15 ) This another aspect of the film which conflicted with my personalized beliefs in that I don t belive that Washington politicians have this familiar of a birth with Hollywood or that they would rely on a Hollywood producer to create something this intricate and important in world affairs . Any military assemble by the unify States in reality would be monitored by the entire industrialize world and it is possible that a destabilizing effect would cause a real fight even if a fake war was presented by way of the American mediaAnother...If you destiny to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper