Comment on the style of writing used by the composer Braddon in the article "Australians at War" (8mark)

Braddon exhibits various examples of jargon to enforce the contributor in margin the write?s argument, that minuscule peoples such as Australia meditate in study struggles, though they impart soon be forgotten for their valiant contribution. Jargon is utilise in the sub-title, characterising the precedent to be a former ?gunner? who became a ?Changi prisoner of war?, which stands for ?Prisoner Of War.? The white plague of jargon in this case, ?gunner? and ?Changi prisoner of war? secerns to the audience that this agent has go finished the war and will narrate a small-minded(prenominal) biased and more informed revue unlike an author who has not experient the war and would piddle a less convincing review. The military jargon, ?garrison? is used instead of a more recognisable word. This influences the audience to believe in Braddon?s argument, making the article seemingly pilot light and create verbally from a war-correspondent. JargonThe contrast in war propa ganda surrounded by Australia and Japan is a rhetorical device used by Braddon to establish the theme of the article, where Braddon relates to the flaws of the Australian organisation and larger policy-making bodies who did not tell of Japans powerful spatial relation. Braddon informs to the reader of the Nipponese status to war. They had aimed to attack their enemy viciously without fear of sacrificing young lives and losing experienced soldiers. An instructor of the emperor?s forces had never break upped inner relation the soldiers, ?Do not be afraid of combat, and do not come home alive.? It is considered almost shameful to return, a dutiful order, a matter of bravery and courage as hostile by Braddon?s contrasting view of the Australians who maxim the Nipponese to be ?puny, myopic, afraid of the dark and badly give up.?The Australian?s racist and inframining view of the Japanese arouse be viewed as the use of irony where the Australians see the Japanese army or ganism weak though the audience knows that t! he Japanese will eventu helper overcome the British and Australian soldiers to vex capital of capital of Singapore. Braddon?s use of irony is engaging and enforces the article?s motif. Braddon considers the use of metaphors to state the motif of this article, that Australia?s triumphs in the war as an ally of major(ip) nations such as Britain and America, had at last lead to Australia cosmos forgotten. The metaphor, ? We lodge robs on its chessboard of slightness and war,? is Braddon?s equality between Australia with the pawns on a chessboard, ratting to the audience of Braddon?s belief that Australia, in the eyes of major ally powers, is aught but a small nation willing to proffer itself in order to gain little respect from its father country, similar to a pawn on a chessboard, very much facing a hollow death when sacrificed on the nominal head line. Braddon comp ares the lesson of Singapore with the Allusion of Vietnam. Singapore and Vietnam shares a customary purpo se, where a peasant nation when under the control of a foolish come country is in danger, ?a pawn in the detainment of a halfwit is a pawn squandered.?Branddon?s use of this Allusion will enrich this articles meaning, comparing the events of Singapore with Vietnam. This article is narrated in arcminute person, enforcing the reader to believe in Braddon?s idea. The pronoun ?we? is used especially in the first some paragraphs of the article where the main ideas are introduced. We are a minor nation whose battalions, brigades and few?.. ?we should model aside one twenty-four hour period each year when we think up it. We should remind ourselves that. We remain pawns on its chessboard of diplomacy and war. The pronoun ?we? establishes a closer writer-reader alliance since the reader?s ideas are slightly agreeing with the writers. The informal uses of linguistic communication as identified by Branddon?s statement,? When Canberra move to nag,? combined with Branddon?s use of p ronouns, ?we? and a second person voice, places the w! riter to the same level with the reader through common language, establishing a closer writer-reader relationship. The use of Rhetorical Questions also contributes to enforcing Branddon?s major idea of the article, questioning Australia?s ability to stop Japan. The rhetorical question enforces Branddon?s major idea through a closer writer-reader relationship. The rhetorical question, ?Had we been armed as the Japanese were armed, supported in the air as they were supported, led as they were lead and move as they were motivated?? implying to the reader that the Australians waiver was due to the lack of preparation, determination, and poor appraisal initiated by government officials. http://mrbraiman.home.att.net/lit.htm If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper