Research critique part 2 Essay

Quantitative look for CritiqueThis is a quantitative teach research critique of the research examine conducted by Lisa M Black PhD,RN,CNE, calamity into Policy A Quantitative deliberate of Nurses Attitudes Toward enduring Advocacy Activities. The findings from this research find out was utilize in the take of Nevada to hold dear nurses when reporting un right conditions in persevering give economic aid practices, thus providing a safer pop off environment where nurses can feel safe when speaking out where uncomplaining golosh is in jeopardy from shaky care practices. Protection of Human ParticipantsThe benefits of this study were the concept of legal comfortion for whistleblowers in the state of Nevada. thither were no risks to any participants safety for this study. Informed consent was not mandatory as retuning the completed purview was viewed as consent to be included. All friendship in the study was viewed as voluntary. approbation of the field of study a nimal was obtained from the University of Nevada, Reno prior to radical info collection. (Black, 2011, p. 29) data CollectionThe certified variables in this study are the registered nurses certify to practice in the state of Nevada the breakaway variable was the Registered Nurses Workplace Support for Patient Advocacy Activities Study Questionnaire.(Black, 2011, p. 29) Data was serene through the developed questionnaire that was sent to 1725 registered nurses with active, incumbent licensure and residing in the state of Nevada at the clock time of the survey.(Black, 2011, p. 29) The author provided no rationale for employ the elect data collection method, I would assume that this was the approximately cost trenchant and best way to maintain seclusion for all answerers. The surveys were sent out development the United States Postal Service on September 8, 2008.(Black, 2011, p. 30) The respondents were asked to complete the survey by one of two methods, filling out, and travel the paper survey via US postal service or by end it online. All responses were accepted through October 31, 2008. (Black, 2011, p. 30) afterward distribution of the questionnaire respondents were given the time bound listed September 8, 2008 through October 31, 2008 to respond to the survey either written or online. (Black, 2011, p. 30) Data Management and AnalysisA priori force play analysis was performed and established that a stripped-down essay of 405 respondents would be required to keep an eye on a medium effect size of it.(Black, 2011, p. 29) In order to determine if the study sample was demographically representative of nurses in Nevada, the demographic data was compared to the data from the 2004 National Sample conform to of Registered Nurses from Nevada. (Black, 2011, p. 29) Reliability examen of the survey tool demonstrated a high distributor point of internal consistency. (Black, 2011, p. 30) No statistical software program was mentioned in this study .Other than the reliability testing performed, the survey results were calculated with a organic of 564 valid responses collected this represented 33% response rate. (Black, 2011, p. 30) Response number alter from item to item as most participants left one or to a greater extent items blank. (Black, 2011, p. 30) I felt this study was a reliable source of information concerning legislating protecting whistleblowers from workplace retaliation. According to the priori world power analysis the token(prenominal) sample needed of 405 respondents was required with 564 valid responses received the minimum sample size was met. (Black, 2011, p. 29)The limitations that are set in this study were, the sample size was considered to be small, even with the randomly chosen sample there was a emfity response bias, and due to the nurses who have negatively charged work environments may be to a greater extent than likely to complete the questionnaire than those with a more positive one. (Bla ck, 2011, p. 33) This created the potential for inflated mission of the frequency and severity of these experiences. (Black, 2011, p. 33) This is the reason for discretion when applying the findings to nurses outside of this study. (Black, 2011, p. 33) The survey tool did not allow for differentiation of different types of unsafe situations or different levels of retaliation. (Black, 2011, p. 34) Interpretation of survey questions may vary from one respondent to another.(Black, 2011, p. 34) This research study was presented in a logical easily understood expressive style with explanation and definition of findings and limitations. The findings of this study to were used in the unveiling of a impartiality protecting nurses reporting unsafe patient care practices in acute care facilities and free standing offices and clinics in Nevada. The creation of this legislation helps create an environment for nurses to show out their moral imperative to continue harm to patients whenever possible and to report potential or actual causes of harm to protect patients.(Black, 2011, p. 35) There were no suggestions for future research. There was suggestion for changes in workplace environments advance openness in communication and in particular in cases where patient safety is a concern. (Black, 2011, p. 35)