Friday, February 1, 2019
Abortion is Not the Reason for Lower Crime Rates Essay -- Argumentativ
What is wrong with the ivory tower? The appointment of Peter (Death to Disabled Newborns) Singer to the bioethics cogency at Princeton University has generated considerable controversy. Recently, University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and Stanford University Law School prof John Donohue III created a furor with their research paper Legalized stillbirth and Crime. The authors contend that legalized miscarriage fueled the drop in crime in the 1990s because a new subclass of humanity theyve identified- women most at stake to construct children who would engage in criminal activity-have high abortion rates, thus preemptively executing the would-be felons. This subclass, we are told, is populated predominantly by women who are teens, single and/or African American. Talk about your antenatal racial profiling The American public is supposed to be pleasurable to have been spared the cost of not only the crimes, but due process, audition by jury, incarceration, appeals and ex ecution. The paper footnotes even the title with preliminary and incomplete, and contains all flair of caveats on the well recognized potential shortcomings of the crime data and concedes the general impossibility of ever proving the asserted causal link with any degree of certainty. heretofore it brazenly attempts to put a happy face on the achingly private and national tragedy that is abortion. That is why articles extolling the findings are popping up throughout the pro-abortion press, while indignant editorials are questioning the authors eugenicist leanings. It was, after all, Planned blood founder Margaret Sanger who established contraceptive clinics in ghettos so that defectives and human weeds could be eliminated. Wi... ...gnant, compared to 20 percent of girls in the same age multitude in D.C. public schools. About 10 percent of the Best Friends participants ages 12-18 had had sex, compared to 72% of their peers. Why the decline in crime in the 1990s? some(pre nominal) plausible explanations have been reported (and given short shrift by the authors), including higher conviction rates and longer prison terms which are guardianship repeat offenders off the streets, more police and better policing strategies, decline in the crack cocaine trade and higher expenditures in victim precautions equal security guards, alarms, car theft devices, etc. Might I fire another avenue of research? Lets determine what conditions lead families to produce academics who have no sense of the sanctity and dignity of human life. Some proterozoic childhood intervention in values education might genuinely pay off.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment